Politically Correct? Get over it! Disagree? ok. No really, it's ok.

I shared this email with my Dad, brother and wife, about 2 weeks before the tragic Ft. Hood shootings. We were discussing the issues from varying perspectives. Can we continue to have discussions and disagree in this country with true freedom of speech? Can we look at the facts without being labeled... a nut-case, fanatical, abusive, etc. If not, I am afraid we have moved beyond the point of no return. I post these thoughts un-apologetically, but with no ill-will or evil intentions. We cannot simply ignore the elephant in the room. There are serious issues surrounding extremely violent Islam. This is not merely an isolated act of terrorism, but has shown itself globally to be a growing trend of horrible atrocities. What will happen if we deny the realities of our day and fail to provide a secure place for our children and theirs? Here are some thoughts that are really not PC. Sorry...Look, I know this is a very inflammatory topic, so I will try to respond with care and grace. My response will be secular, in the sense that I will give two separate responses: church and state. I know that in reality it is ridiculous to try to separate the two, but I will try.

My church response as a pastor is that we must recognize that worldly govts. come and go, and that we are foreigners and aliens in this world (1 Peter 2:11). Nonetheless, we are called to live here and now, and bloom where we are planted (see Jeremiah 29). We are called by God to pray for, participate in and support those who are governing the lands we live in, as much as we can. "Render to Caesar what is Caesars" Jesus said. But at the same time, we are also those who look to Jesus as our Lord, not Caesar. We will not bow down to earthly leaders and worship them. To claim "Jesus is Lord" which is the rally cry of all followers of Jesus, is to imply that "Caesar (or the govt.) is not".

We have brothers and sisters around the world who are followers of Jesus living in many different governmental situations, ranging from oppressive totalitarian dictatorships to those free to worship openly and freely as they choose. We in the West who are blessed enough to live in a democracy must recognize that our situation is an anomaly compared to the rest of the world. Most followers around the globe live under persecution, expecting to experience torture at some point and possibly even martyrdom for choosing to go against the grain and worship the Creator God and Father of Jesus Christ. I don't think we in the West can even begin to appreciate the difference that must make. In many regions of the world, there are no nominal followers of Jesus, because they can't afford it. Choosing the state accepted religion can be a matter of life or death. Most of the Christian population today resides in Africa, South America and Asia. Western Christians are now in the minority for the first time in 1,500 yrs.

I appreciate my families freedom to gather in the open and worship regularly, as well as the freedom for others of other faiths to do the same. From my perspective, democracy offers a freedom of religion that no other system in the recent history of the world has ever offered. I want to share the Good News of Jesus with as many people as I can, but I would never force or coerce anyone to follow Jesus. The way of Christ is a personal journey that involves seeking to love and live fully in the midst of a radical community of like-minded folks, Jesus' way, with the help of God's Spirit, to the glory of God the Father. This can happen regardless of the state, but will certainly become more dangerous and difficult if the state opposes such freedom.

Now from a state perspective: We can gather a lot about Islam by observing the history of its spread around the world. Anyone who claims Islam is a peaceful religion which promotes healthy boundaries for its followers is not looking at the facts. The only difference I can really see between radical Islam and moderate Islam is that the moderates are waiting for the Mahdi (Muslim Messiah) to arrive on the scene before sharia law is established. There is no perfect world system, and I don't think there ever will be. The idea of a perfect worldly utopia run by human beings is a ridiculous concept that will never happen. Every human being I know has issues of some sort or another, and any system developed by humans will have a shadow side to it. And yet there are some systems that perform better than others, depending upon what we consider to be good. If freedom is considered a positive result of a system, then I see democracy as the best tool we have developed yet, although it is not perfect. Granted democracy can get ugly at times - it can become partisan at times, but that is part of the beauty, as well as part of the shadow.

If absolute control by a few considered elite is the result we are seeking, there have been many models throughout the millenia, and currently are several we can look at today: socialism, communism, fascism, totalitarianism, etc. I do believe that Islam is in line with these totalitarian models, as it is a theocratic form of political rule whereby the religious leaders impose muslim sharia law upon a population (extremely controlling), expecting that everyone will conform, or else suffer the consequences. Certainly there are some Westernized Muslims who do not want to live under, nor abide by sharia law, but they are a minority, not the majority. That is why they have moved to a free country. We don't hear from a lot of them because they know that if they speak out, they are likely to be terrorized by the Islamic proponents of jihad and sharia law. But, that does not overrule the global reality that the majority of Muslims are living under the geo-political movement established by Muhammed of Islam - and these folks are actively immigrating around the world, setting up culturally comfortable neighborhoods, and rather than integrating into the resident cultures and living with the democratic policies of the states, are rather working to import their native sharia law and supplant the existing laws which are offensive to them. They are moving to the U.S. and Canada in record numbers.

I think that Europe is a great example of what can happen in a very short time to a state governement. What has made Europe more susceptible to this phenomenon, I believe is the socialization of their state systems. When government attempts to become all things to everyone, the govt. is likely to fall very short. In the sharia law system, the govt./religion becomes all things to everyone, but maintains absolute control over everyone at the same time. They tell you what you can say, what you can do, how to worship, how to dress, what to think, etc...

In recent decades, Europe has attempted a social experiment whereby they attempted to allow as much freedom as possible, while letting the government run as much as possible. Government influence over citizens lives grew while at the same time seeking to provide freedom of borders, freedom from work (welfare), freedom from sickness (socialized medicine), freedom from hate (hate laws), freedom from offense (political correctness), etc. Freedom is great, but there must be some healthy boundaries in a society as well. Unchecked freedom results in chaos. The result has been a massive influx of foreigners, and a lack of any national sense of who people are. "Who are we? Well, we are those who allow the govt. to make our lives better. We trust the govt. to solve our problems, i.e., we don't need to think for ourselves, make decisions for ourselves, work for ourselves, because we have smart leaders to do all of that for us". It happens under the guise of a level playing field, but the reality is that the govt. always is above the people. The result for citizens of the state is a lack of pride, character, incentive, effort and identity. The good intentions of a welfare state seem to always result in the negative results of a loss of respect for self, loss of identity, loss of purpose, loss of vocation, loss of productivity, loss of freedom (yes), loss of imagination and creativity, and loss of the important expectation that everyone in a society to should contribute to the well-being of all. The mantra becomes: "I'm gonna get mine... from the govt. - they owe me" - the state becomes the savior of the people, but in reality the state is very fallible and unable to effectively produce what it seeks to provide.There is a very evident shadow side to socialism... we lose: "Of the People", and "By the People"... and simply have "For the People".

Those proponents of sharia law despise the freedoms of democracy, and recognize and are taking advantage of the weaknesses of socialist-democracies. The door is wide open for "Allah" to reign all over the globe, and sharia law to be implemented as the world-wide legal system. Islam will settle for no less. In my opinion, the primary role of the state is to provide security for it's people. If we in the United States don't wake up and recognize what is happening, it won't be too far in the future before our children and grand-children are facing an Islamic choice - convert and embrace sharia law, or face persecution and possible martyrdom. This is the reality we face.